<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Relpost Launched</title> <atom:link href="http://www.awayback.com/relpost-launched/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.awayback.com/relpost-launched/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 05:02:53 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Amrinder</title><link>http://www.awayback.com/relpost-launched/comment-page-1/#comment-2092</link> <dc:creator>Amrinder</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:27:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.awayback.com/?p=972#comment-2092</guid> <description>@Charles: Thanks for the feedback and valuable links.Typefaces changed from Calluna to Hoefler Text and Museo Sans to Tahoma.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Charles: Thanks for the feedback and valuable links.</p><p>Typefaces changed from Calluna to Hoefler Text and Museo Sans to Tahoma.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Charles Roper</title><link>http://www.awayback.com/relpost-launched/comment-page-1/#comment-2090</link> <dc:creator>Charles Roper</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 11:58:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.awayback.com/?p=972#comment-2090</guid> <description>A great idea. It&#039;s almost impossible to track all of the high quiality posts and articles out there on various topics, so it&#039;s nice to have someone do it for us. :)And a great looking site... unless you&#039;re on Windows. Unfortunately, Museo Sans isn&#039;t well hinted and therefore renders badly with ClearType at medium to small sizes; it renders terribly with ClearType off and renders barely acceptably with IE9 DirectWrite. Looking at the design on Windows makes me suspect you designed it on a Mac? It looks lovely on a Mac and on Safari Windows (which uses the same text rendering engine as OS X).Here&#039;s a screenshot comparing Safari, Firefox (standard ClearType) and IE9 (DirectWrite).http://i.imgur.com/l1Zb7.pngAs you should be able to see, Safari looks best to us designers, but it&#039;s renowned for rendering text fuzzily or heavily. The Firefox example doesn&#039;t look great any way you look at it. Large type is clearly showing a lack of Y-axis anti-aliasing, and Museo has clumsy hinting. IE9&#039;s DirectWrite text looks lovely at larger sizes - more delicate that Safari&#039;s effort, but it still hints heavily at medium to small sizes and, as we&#039;ve established, Museo is not well hinted and so it doesn&#039;t look good.There are several reasons Microsoft don&#039;t take the Apple strategy, with one being that research has found well hinted text is more readable than unhinted text, given you have a font with good hinting built-in. Another reason is that people who are used to the &#039;sharp&#039; nature of ClearType find OS X rendering &#039;fuzzy&#039;. I remember when my organisation turned on ClearType for the first time; they had so many complaints about fuzziness, they had to turn it back off again, much to my frustration. One person moaned, &quot;I felt like I had something wrong with my glasses.&quot;I personally mostly prefer OS X and Safari rendering, but I&#039;m a designer and I&#039;m not working for my own pleasure. The way different systems render text is a constraint and I have to design around it. That means testing on Windows and making font choices accordingly.But don&#039;t take my word for it, he&#039;s a great article on the subject that interviews some real experts:http://readableweb.com/font-hinting-explained-by-a-font-design-master/This topic of hinting might make a great RelPost, eh? Here&#039;s another related article:http://24ways.org/2009/real-fonts-and-rendering (the comments contain lots of good stuff - make sure you check those)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A great idea. It&#8217;s almost impossible to track all of the high quiality posts and articles out there on various topics, so it&#8217;s nice to have someone do it for us. :)</p><p>And a great looking site&#8230; unless you&#8217;re on Windows. Unfortunately, Museo Sans isn&#8217;t well hinted and therefore renders badly with ClearType at medium to small sizes; it renders terribly with ClearType off and renders barely acceptably with IE9 DirectWrite. Looking at the design on Windows makes me suspect you designed it on a Mac? It looks lovely on a Mac and on Safari Windows (which uses the same text rendering engine as OS X).</p><p>Here&#8217;s a screenshot comparing Safari, Firefox (standard ClearType) and IE9 (DirectWrite).</p><p><a
href="http://i.imgur.com/l1Zb7.png" rel="nofollow">http://i.imgur.com/l1Zb7.png</a></p><p>As you should be able to see, Safari looks best to us designers, but it&#8217;s renowned for rendering text fuzzily or heavily. The Firefox example doesn&#8217;t look great any way you look at it. Large type is clearly showing a lack of Y-axis anti-aliasing, and Museo has clumsy hinting. IE9&#8242;s DirectWrite text looks lovely at larger sizes &#8211; more delicate that Safari&#8217;s effort, but it still hints heavily at medium to small sizes and, as we&#8217;ve established, Museo is not well hinted and so it doesn&#8217;t look good.</p><p>There are several reasons Microsoft don&#8217;t take the Apple strategy, with one being that research has found well hinted text is more readable than unhinted text, given you have a font with good hinting built-in. Another reason is that people who are used to the &#8216;sharp&#8217; nature of ClearType find OS X rendering &#8216;fuzzy&#8217;. I remember when my organisation turned on ClearType for the first time; they had so many complaints about fuzziness, they had to turn it back off again, much to my frustration. One person moaned, &#8220;I felt like I had something wrong with my glasses.&#8221;</p><p>I personally mostly prefer OS X and Safari rendering, but I&#8217;m a designer and I&#8217;m not working for my own pleasure. The way different systems render text is a constraint and I have to design around it. That means testing on Windows and making font choices accordingly.</p><p>But don&#8217;t take my word for it, he&#8217;s a great article on the subject that interviews some real experts:</p><p><a
href="http://readableweb.com/font-hinting-explained-by-a-font-design-master/" rel="nofollow">http://readableweb.com/font-hinting-explained-by-a-font-design-master/</a></p><p>This topic of hinting might make a great RelPost, eh? Here&#8217;s another related article:</p><p><a
href="http://24ways.org/2009/real-fonts-and-rendering" rel="nofollow">http://24ways.org/2009/real-fonts-and-rendering</a> (the comments contain lots of good stuff &#8211; make sure you check those)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: praveen</title><link>http://www.awayback.com/relpost-launched/comment-page-1/#comment-1476</link> <dc:creator>praveen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 05:23:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.awayback.com/?p=972#comment-1476</guid> <description>Nice one!
Clean, usable, informative.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice one!<br
/> Clean, usable, informative.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 6/16 queries in 0.008 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.awayback.com @ 2012-02-04 09:06:48 -->
