<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Helvetica vs. Arial</title> <atom:link href="http://www.awayback.com/arial-vs-helvetica/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.awayback.com/arial-vs-helvetica/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 05:02:53 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Amrinder</title><link>http://www.awayback.com/arial-vs-helvetica/comment-page-1/#comment-263</link> <dc:creator>Amrinder</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 05:11:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.awayback.com/?p=69#comment-263</guid> <description>I would recommend using &lt;code&gt;Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;&lt;/code&gt; for headings (larger than 14px) and &lt;code&gt;Arial, sans-serif;&lt;/code&gt; for body text. Helvetica is nice typeface and widely accepted, but on Windows text set in Helvetica below 16px doesn&#039;t display well, so it should be used for headings only (or large text).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would recommend using <code>Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;</code> for headings (larger than 14px) and <code>Arial, sans-serif;</code> for body text. Helvetica is nice typeface and widely accepted, but on Windows text set in Helvetica below 16px doesn&#8217;t display well, so it should be used for headings only (or large text).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Prashant</title><link>http://www.awayback.com/arial-vs-helvetica/comment-page-1/#comment-259</link> <dc:creator>Prashant</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:03:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.awayback.com/?p=69#comment-259</guid> <description>Hey Amrinder, nice post. Which one you recommended to use to design a website, most of the times? and why?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Amrinder, nice post. Which one you recommended to use to design a website, most of the times? and why?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Amrinder</title><link>http://www.awayback.com/arial-vs-helvetica/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link> <dc:creator>Amrinder</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:13:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.awayback.com/?p=69#comment-37</guid> <description>Haas Miedinger  set out to design a new sans-serif typeface that could compete with Akzidenz-Grotesk in the Swiss market.The aim of the new design was to create a neutral typeface that had great clarity, had no intrinsic meaning in its form, and could be used on a wide variety of signage.In 1960, the typeface&#039;s name was changed by Haas&#039; German parent company Stempel to Helvetica (derived from Confoederatio Helvetica, the Latin name for Switzerland) in order to make it more marketable internationally.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haas Miedinger  set out to design a new sans-serif typeface that could compete with Akzidenz-Grotesk in the Swiss market.</p><p>The aim of the new design was to create a neutral typeface that had great clarity, had no intrinsic meaning in its form, and could be used on a wide variety of signage.</p><p>In 1960, the typeface&#8217;s name was changed by Haas&#8217; German parent company Stempel to Helvetica (derived from Confoederatio Helvetica, the Latin name for Switzerland) in order to make it more marketable internationally.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 5/16 queries in 0.013 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.awayback.com @ 2012-02-04 09:10:17 -->
